|
Welcome to |
|
|
Stop the Torture of Autistic Kids - Franklin Must Go! (Cherry Hill, NJ)
From: Bob
Witanek [mailto:bwitanek@igc.org]
Dear Board and Administration of Cherry Hill, NJ Public Schools,
You strike our children into your little autism room, we see it as a blow against the close to a million members of special education families across the state of New Jersey. We will not be silent and allow you to yield this reprehensible action against our children. The whole state is aware of this issue and you are just starting to feel the first ripples of what the reaction will be. The question is, will you be complicit in this horrendous action with your silence or will you act immediately to clear house of the responsible parties and address immediately address the legitimate and necessary concerns of the parents in your district?
We await your immediate action.
Bob Witanek NJ Student Advocacy Union http://StudentAdvocate-NJ.org (for identification purposes only),
-----Original Message-----
From my board: Dear SEPTA Members,
We on the SEPTA board of officers are very aware of the attention that arose in the media in the last day or so, regarding the "Quiet Rooms" at Knight and Kilmer. Because this attention raises so many questions, I believe it is beneficial to communicate to everyone what we have done and continue to do on this issue.
Shortly after the rooms came to our attention in an October 2007 Parent's Forum, I summarized all of the concerns that were discussed at the forum in an October 22nd letter to Ms. Franklin. Shortly thereafter, two SEPTA board officers viewed the rooms and met productively with district staff.
The following communications ensued: (Attached for review) · I sent Ms. Franklin another letter on October 29 th requesting specific information and offering SEPTA assistance in fashioning district policies regarding such rooms · Ms. Franklin sent me an email addressing issues I raised in the October 22nd SEPTA correspondence, but lacking the specificity sought, and not addressing the issue of policies and the creation of policies · Ms. Franklin responded in a November 6th correspondence to the SEPTA letter of October 22 nd, and referenced her October 30th email regarding the rooms
Agreement was met that SEPTA and the district would meet on November 26th to address how issues were to be submitted for resolution with the district. I attended that meeting with Lynette Howard of Zone PTA. The district was cordial and generous with their time. It was agreed that SEPTA's remaining issues would be submitted to the protocols outlined in that meeting.
The following day, I fielded a number of media inquiries regarding the rooms. I articulated for the media, so that SEPTA would not be misunderstood, the following: · We found out about the rooms in October and undertook a fact finding effort; · We sent representatives to view the rooms and discuss them with staff; · We corresponded with District and they corresponded with us; · We met with District yesterday and came to an understanding on how issues/concerns should be presented to District, and intended to submit this issue to that process; · We have not reached any "agreement" with District on the rooms and we are not satisfied with the amount of information we have received; · We are seeking the policies, procedures, practices, records, related to the rooms and the training of the staff utilizing them; · We cannot know how many kids were in the rooms due to non-verbal students, emotional distress, etc.; · We question the degree to which any consent by parents to have their children use the rooms was informed consent; · We are opposed to the use of aversives, to include isolation; · We take the position that any room that a child is removed to should be similar in its appointment, conductivity to learning, level of instruction; and equally appropriate in meeting the child's IEP as the room he/she left.
Please understand, as members of SEPTA, the following important points: ·
SEPTA values
transparency in all of our dealings. That is why we post our correspondence on
our website at
http://www.chlive. · SEPTA values membership privacy. We were not responsible for this issue being in the media and we took no role in the media's coverage. · SEPTA values relationships. We have sought to deal with the district face to face, in a respectful, cordial, and collaborative manner. · SEPTA values fair play. Once we understood how the district wanted issues addressed, we respected and followed the policies. · SEPTA values the welfare of special needs children. Our focus remains on their interests and welfare. Not ours, not the district's.
We know the last day or two have been stressful on our membership. We plan to move forward and re-double our efforts to bring resolution to the issues that concern our membership. We look forward to the district's continued goodwill and cooperation, and we are optimistic that good things can come from these recent events.
Sincerely,
Bob Bourbon President - SEPTA
Dear friends, From the web boards: "I was so saddned to hear of this story. I had to
pull my 3.5 year old son (autism) out of school in Racine, WI a couple months
ago due to a similar situation. He was mechanically restrained without my
knowledge or consent. This affected him adversely of course. When I tried to
talk to the school about it, they actually argued with me and would not admit
that it was wrong. The director of spcial ed. resigned w/out notice, DPI issued
corrective action, but who cares. The teacher(s) are still there, doing the same
thing or worse to other kids. Anytime, a person (child or adult) is viewed as a
second class citizen things like this will continue to happen. I truly admire
the Cherry Hill community for standing together (for the most part) and calling
for resignations and change. Best of luck to the family...I wish you all the
best."
|
Ask the Advocate Past Activities |