|
Welcome to |
|
|
TESTIMONY TO STATE BOARD HEARING ON REVISIONS TO
STATE CODE By Bob Witanek, Editor of The Student Advocate Website http://StudentAdvocate-NJ.org and The New Jersey Student Advocate newspaper and Coordinator of the Thousands for Stronger Special Education Protections Petition Drive PO Box 1214, Belle Mead, New Jersey 08502 * 908-881-5275 * Fax: 908-281-7873 * Advocate@StudentAdvocate-NJ.org Good Evening. I am Bob Witanek, editor of the Student Advocate Website, coordinator of the Thousands for Stronger Special Education Protections for petition drive, and editor of The New Jersey Student Advocate newspaper. I object to the following
board actions: These actions limit a democratic and collaborative process. The hearing process must be overhauled. This board has been presented with a petition signed by 2000. The support among parents of special education students is broad based. 90 – 95% of parents of special education children who are asked sign on. It is a mistake to underestimate the power of this statement and the unity behind it. The petition is only the beginning of an organizing drive within our community. This petition is not emotional – it is a clear demand on behalf of thousands of special education parents. We are demanding that the following be kept in place: short term objectives, mid-year progress reports, pre IDEIA 2004 manifest determination protections, stay put provisions, current rules for IEP meeting participation, 14 as age for transition services. We oppose 3-year IEP plans, forced state mediation prior to due process, statute of limitation on a student’s legal right to hold a district legally accountable, the lengthening of the time for which a student can be removed to an alternative educational setting and the reduction in frequency of notification of a parent’s rights. What action is the state taking to eliminate rampant racial disparities in special education? The weakening of parental and student rights will only exacerbate these disparities. Such steps are unconscionable. For us parents, we need to begin to understand the political mechanisms behind these changes both in Washington DC and right here in Trenton. We are far outgunned by lobbyists for directors associations, school board coalitions, teachers unions, professional associations and the like. The good groups that fight for our children are 501C3 non-profs and state funded agencies. They do their best but their definition prevents them from overt political activities due to the funding source of such organizations and agencies. On the other hand, the associations which lobby against our rights do not wear those political handcuffs. The Abramoff scandal in Washington DC provides a window in just how the game is played that brings us into this room today. We need to build some new parent organizations, a parent’s union. We need an organization that is not beholden to state funding nor to restrictive 501C3 rules – an organization independent from the school districts. We need an organization that can use the same political tools that are currently being wielded against our most vulnerable children with disabilities in Washington DC and right here in Trenton. However this board rules on the issues outlined in the petition – it will define the terms of our future efforts. Should it heed our concerns, it will demonstrate for us the efficacy of a unified effort. Should it turn its back on our children, we can learn a lesson in the politics of special education – it will help us define the parameters of the next steps for our effort. Never for a moment underestimate our power should we become organized, unified and engaged in a continuing effort on behalf of the rights of our children. This effort must include our children – they need to learn to carry this struggle forward for they are the ones who ultimately will deal with the results of our efforts. The future of our children demands nothing less of us. |
Ask the Advocate Past Activities |